Pasadena & Beverly Hills Divorce Attorney

The Graves Law Firm
Call Today! 626.513.8227
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Demetria Graves
  • Family Law
  • Testimonials
  • Firm News
  • Video Blog
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu
Video Blog 2011 July Cheaters Beware - GPS Tracking Upheld by Court
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Cheaters Beware - GPS Tracking Upheld by Court

Posted By demetriagraves || 14-Jul-2011

A New Jersey appeals court recently ruled that straying spouses tracked by GPS does not constitute an invasion of their privacy.

County Sheriff's Officer Kenneth Villanova, sparked the debate when he sued his wife for invasion of privacy during their divorce proceedings, claiming the GPS invaded his right to privacy and caused him "substantial and permanent emotional distress."

Initially, the officer included private investigator, Richard Leonard, hired by Mrs. Villanova, but dropped his suit against the wife and pursued the private eye. Apparently Leonard recommended Mrs. Villanova buy the device after he was unable to tail the police officer on his own. Two weeks after the device was installed, Leonard caught the officer leaving a driveway with another woman.

Appellate Judges Joseph Lisa, Jack Sabatino and Carmen Alvarez said no direct evidence proved the GPS, installed in the plaintiff's glove compartment for 40 days before he noticed it, captured Villanova in any secluded places where he had a right to expect privacy. The device only tracked Villanova's movements on public streets, and that information was then passed on to Leonard via Villanova's wife, said Judge Lisa.

There are currently no state laws governing the use of GPS tracking devices. Villanova's suit was the first of its kind.

This ruling does not affect law enforcement officers, in June, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a lawsuit that will determine whether police need to obtain a warrant signed by a judge before installing GPS trackers on the citizen's vehicles.

Following an arrest and conviction on cocaine charges, Antoine Jones, a Washington, D.C. nightclub owner, argued that the warrantless use of the GPS device clearly violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia agreed and tossed Jones' conviction in August 2010 "because it was obtained with evidence procured in violation of the Fourth Amendment."

Jones asserted that police used a GPS device to track his every move for at least a month prior to his arrest. The Amendment, which falls under the Bill of Rights, also requires law enforcement officers to have probable cause in order to secure search warrants. A ruling on the matter, which the Obama Administration disagrees with, is expected by October.

Categories: Divorce, Family Law

Share Post

Family Law

How Can We Help You?

  • Divorce
  • Divorce FAQ
  • Child Custody
  • Visitation
  • Property Division
  • Spousal Support/Alimony
  • Child Support
  • Bankruptcy & Divorce
  • Paternity
  • Legal Separations
  • Mediation
  • Relocation
  • The Family Law Attorney Vault

The Graves Law Firm

We Can Help You Make a Fresh Start

I would like to receive It Doesn't Have To Be Ugly e-book for free!

Send My Information
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
The Graves Law Firm

Call Today (626) 513-8227

The Graves Law Firm - Pasadena & Beverly Hills Family Law Attorney
1055 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 500a, Pasadena, CA 91106 View Map
Main (626) 513-8227
Local (855) 653-3517
Beverly Hills Office: 9595 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 900
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Phone: (310) 300-4023
Website: http://www.losangeles-divorcelaw.com/
© 2022 All Rights Reserved.
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.